Skip to main content
Financial services technology

Industries

Financial services systems built for scrutiny.

Onboarding and KYC automation, post-trade and settlement systems, and compliance workflows — for banks, NBFCs, insurers and fintechs where the architecture has to answer to a regulator as well as a customer.

At a glance

KYC
Onboarding automation
Document capture, verification and case handling
Post-trade
Settlement systems
Reconciliation, breaks and exception workflow
Audit trail
Evidence by design
Immutable logs of who changed what, and when
Zero-trust
Access architecture
Least privilege across accounts, data and services

The pressures

What makes financial services engineering hard.

These are the structural constraints we design around. They are properties of the sector, not of any one organisation.

Regulatory reporting load

Reporting obligations arrive on fixed cycles and in prescribed formats. When the numbers are assembled by hand from several systems, every submission is a reconciliation exercise and every correction is a manual re-run.

Data spread across core, risk and ledger systems
Lineage that is hard to demonstrate to a reviewer
Manual assembly that cannot be re-executed reliably

Legacy core systems

Core banking and policy administration platforms are long-lived by design. The pressure is not to replace them, but to build around them without destabilising the systems of record underneath.

Batch windows that constrain what can be real time
Integration through file drops and point-to-point links
Change cost that rises with every undocumented dependency

Onboarding friction

Customer and counterparty onboarding sits between commercial urgency and regulatory obligation. Verification steps, document collection and screening all have to happen, and each hand-off is where applications stall.

Document collection repeated across products
Screening results that need human adjudication
No single view of where a case is stuck

Settlement and operational risk

Post-trade processing is unforgiving: a break found late is more expensive than one found early. The operational question is how quickly an exception surfaces and how clearly it is routed to whoever can resolve it.

Reconciliation across custodians and counterparties
Exception queues without clear ownership
Limited visibility into cut-off and cut-over timing

What we build

Our services, applied to financial services.

The same engineering practice we bring to any enterprise, shaped by the controls this sector operates under.

Core platform and integration engineering

Service layers, APIs and event pipelines that let modern channels talk to long-lived core systems without rewriting them. The pattern is containment: stable interfaces in front, unchanged systems of record behind.

API and integration layer design
Event-driven processing for post-trade flows
Batch-to-stream migration where it earns its place
Decommissioning paths for point-to-point links

Resilient cloud and platform operations

Infrastructure defined as code, with environments that can be rebuilt rather than repaired, and delivery pipelines that make each change reviewable before it reaches a regulated workload.

Multi-AZ and failover architecture
Infrastructure as code and policy-as-code guardrails
CI/CD with segregation of duties in the pipeline
Data residency held in the deployment topology

Regulatory data and reporting platforms

Data models, ingestion and lineage designed so a reported figure can be traced back to its source records — and so a submission can be reproduced rather than reconstructed.

Lineage captured as part of the pipeline
Reconciliation and break detection
Reporting datasets with versioned definitions
Retention and archival aligned to obligation periods

Applied AI inside controlled workflows

Document extraction, screening triage and case summarisation placed where a human still decides. We treat any model touching credit, risk or eligibility as a governed asset, not a feature toggle.

Document understanding for onboarding packs
Triage and prioritisation with human adjudication
Model documentation, versioning and monitoring
Explicit boundaries on automated decisioning

Governance context

Standards your organisation is held to.

We do not hold these certifications on your behalf. We design and document controls so that your organisation can evidence them against the regimes that apply to it.

Regulatory reporting obligations

Supervisory regimes such as those administered by the RBI and SEBI set out what must be reported, in what form and on what cycle. We design data platforms so those submissions can be produced from traceable sources and reproduced on request.

PCI DSS for cardholder data

Where card data is in scope, PCI DSS defines the control expectations for storage, transmission and access. We architect segmentation, key handling and logging so your organisation can evidence those controls — the certification itself remains yours to hold.

Audit trail and data residency

Regulated workloads need a defensible record of access and change, and a clear answer on where data physically sits. Both are architectural decisions, made at design time rather than retrofitted before an inspection.

Model governance for AI in decisioning

Any model influencing credit, pricing or risk outcomes needs documented purpose, data provenance, validation, monitoring and a route to challenge a decision. We build those controls alongside the model, not after it.

Talk through a financial services build.

Bring us the constraint — a reporting deadline, a core system you cannot touch, an onboarding queue that stalls. We will tell you how we would architect around it.